Take a number and wait until you're called.
My personal odessy into the heart of peace, freedom and doona covers
Published on March 22, 2009 By dynamaso In Blogging

In March 1969, John Lennon and Yoko Ono went conducted the world’s first bed-in for peace. On the 40th anniversary of this event, I take to my bed for the same reasons.

Unfortunately, nothing much in the world has changed. In fact, there is a lot more to be disappointed about when it comes to world peace. Indeed, if John Lennon were still alive, he might well be in a righteous rage because of all the trouble in the world today. But let’s not dwell on these matters. I’m not politically motivated nor do I have any great knowledge of the peace processes carried out around the world today. I am all for peace, though and spending the day in bed is a small price to pay to help the cause.

 

But where did this start? A close friend of mine decided, after the tragedy of September 11, 2001, to mimic Lennon’s form of protest as a way of raising awareness for world peace. He determined he could also raise money for charity as well. Since then, with little fanfare, he has continued to practise this passive protest measure every year on the anniversary of the original bed-in.

Awareness of this event, in a modern landscape of badges, ribbons, bracelets and even moustache growing for various charities, has been pretty minimal. In fact, apart from a few mentions in local newspapers and on the back page of a national daily, the event does not have much of a profile. However, it should.

For the first time this year, he asked friends to think about spending the day in bed as well. Being in bed is one of my favourite places so the sacrifice I had to make, as you can imagine, was quite severe. Coupled with the unconditional support of my wife, the day was going to be one of extreme relaxation. What better acclamation to peace could there possibly be?

So, with very little in mind as to what I might do lying in bed for 24 hours, apart from the very puerile obvious, I awoke today and realised I didn’t have to do anything apart from lie about in bed. Dammit, this was going to be tough but then, someone has to do the tough chores in order to get the message out (or at very least, derive some personal pleasure from the idea their little bit might make a little bit of difference).

After the first few slothful hours, something unexpected happened; I felt vaguely guilty. I felt like I should be helping my wife with the weekend chores. Given she is going away for work for eight days tomorrow, I also felt a little guilty that I was going to spend today lying about, when I could be spending time with her. I felt further guilt I wasn’t going to be able to go to the gym today (I am currently following a fairly rigorous training schedule). However, my wife assured me she was happy to be my support crew for the day and I realised the gym would be there tomorrow.

I turned my attention back to the reason I was in bed to start with: peace. I got thinking about the troubles around the world today. I am visual when I think about things. I rather imagine I’m a satellite looking down from the sky. I can see these troubled areas from space. I imagine these areas to be somewhat like tumours on the landscape of the planet. But unlike tumours, we can’t excise these; they need to heal themselves.

There are many reasons why the world is suffering at the moment. The current world economic crisis, the various ugly skirmishes, border wars, incursions and atrocities happening around the world all came to mind. With these events in mind, the potential to slip into a melancholic stupor was quite tempting. But my thoughts wouldn’t allow slumber.

I thought about the activists who have given their lives for the peace process, those brave nameless folk who put everything they have on the line in order to make the lives of those around them better.

I thought about all the servicemen and women who have died giving their lives to their various countries in the name of peace. I thought about the fact that there are really no winners in war, just better equipped armies capable of more destruction.

I thought about the fact that both sides suffer losses and the really losers are the families of loved ones killed in battle, regardless of what side they are on. I thought about all the children made homeless and orphans, about the decimation of wildlife environments, the wanton destruction of landscapes and the incredible waste of resources that war brings about.

I thought about all this so much, I felt a little sad. So I picked up my guitar, played, and sang some favourite old songs. ‘Khe Sahn’ by Cold Chisel, ‘Sounds Of Then’ by Gangajang and ‘US Forces’ by Midnight Oil. I amazed myself yet again by how many of the words I still knew, as if engraved into the part of my memory that stores song lyrics. Songs of peace; cries of freedom; paeans to liberty. Our cultural history is rich with such yet we still don’t know how to achieve it.

So we struggle on. Some of us actively seek out and do the hard jobs to help the peace process but for most of us, there isn’t much we can do apart from put our hands in our pockets when we can. And what better place to do it from than from the comfort of your own bed?


Comments
on Mar 22, 2009

Great blog.  I love the idea and wish it was getting more attention.  I think lots of people would want to participate in this "passive protest".

on Mar 22, 2009

I wasn't aware of this at all.  I think it is a noble cause.  So you were able to stay in bed the entire day, or just for a certain time period?

on Mar 22, 2009

Tex,

first of all, so good to 'see' you here.  I've been meaning to email you and the family to find out how you're all going.  I saw your blog on the birth of Dahlia but haven't had a chance to read it or respond yet. 

Great blog.  I love the idea and wish it was getting more attention.

Thank you very much.  Given that this has been a side-project for my friend, who is a very busy man (he works a full time job, organises an unsigned local band festival once a year and is on various cultural committees) it has been slow building.  But we're hoping to relaunch it next year with a proper website for registrations, sponsorship forms etc.  Like you, I think it is a great idea as it takes a bit more commitment than putting on a badge or bracelet.  I hope you're right and next year we have lots of people in bed for peace.

Serenity,

You probably wouldn't be aware of it (except of course in respect to John and Yoko) as it has received very little publicity.  But there are a few of us now willing to work for nothing to get it moving along for next year.  The idea is to stay in bed for 24 hours, with a 5 minute break every hour.  Rather than take 5 minutes, I was saving my breaks and getting out of bed once every four or five hours for 20 minutes - enough time to have a good stretch and use the bathroom.  And yes, I stayed in bed for the entire 24 hours.

on Mar 23, 2009

John and Yoko could afford to stay in bed, many are just not that wealthy.

on Mar 23, 2009

Nitro, I'm not suggesting you follow John and Yoko and stay in a fancy hotel.  You do own a bed, don't you?

on Mar 24, 2009

Good blog, Mark and a great idea from your friend. It should recieve more attention.

When it comes to being in bed on a Sunday for 24 hours. I never knew I was such a peace activist.

on Mar 24, 2009

Hey Chris, good to see you mate.  Peace does come with a price, don't you know?

on Mar 25, 2009

Nitro, I'm not suggesting you follow John and Yoko and stay in a fancy hotel. You do own a bed, don't you?

Oh I misunderstood your post, I didn't realize the plan was to stay in bed on the weekend. Otherwise one might miss work, and my original post about the Lenons wealth. And yes I do have a bed, just not the luxury to stay in it. More power to those that can, the current administration is the right one for those folks.

on Mar 26, 2009

Nitro,

I do have a bed, just not the luxury to stay in it.

I guess the difference between you and I is that I don't see peaceful protesting as a luxury, I see it as a right for a person living in a democratic nation.  And your current administration is so new, I have to wonder why some aren't giving him a go before putting shit on him.  But such is human nature I guess.

on Mar 26, 2009

I guess the difference between you and I is that I don't see peaceful protesting as a luxury, I see it as a right for a person living in a democratic nation.

When I see peace protesters here or in countries protest the countries that are causing grief in the world, I might join in. When was the last protest you saw in the west criticizing North Korea? Fact is most don't appreciate what high standards of living they have (Australia too). Many of these people won't be satisfied until it’s lost. How many died in counties like China, N. Korea under the "peace and harmony" mantra? Karl Marx can up with the “perfect” society. How well did that work out for the nations adapting?

I was in my early teens when the Lenon's did their bed in. Did it help get peace in the world? I don't know. What it did do was get the Lenon's publicity and help sell records ($$$). I thought they were hypocrites then and still do. I don’t have a problem with folks wanting peace, but unfortunately you have to fight for it sometimes, and sometimes you have to fight for others. Be glad you live in a society where you can protest, just realize how quickly that can change for the worse.

Good luck with your protest, if you feel you’re accomplishing something than what’s the harm.

And your current administration is so new, I have to wonder why some aren't giving him a go before putting shit on him. But such is human nature I guess.

Read this thread for a quick (but hardly complete) answer.

http://draginol.joeuser.com/article/344366/MASSIVE_DEBT_Change_you_can_believe_in

on Mar 26, 2009

Good luck with your protest, if you feel you’re accomplishing something than what’s the harm.

With all due respect Nitro, this is the biggest put down in blogland! You came out with both barrels firing at this great blog about peace.  Why do you guys do that?  Bloggers like you do the same thing no matter what the topic of discussion. Somehow you guys always have to turn it into some sort of pissing contest.  I think too many of you are hanging out in the political land on JU far too much.  Lighten up man!

on Mar 27, 2009

With all due respect Nitro, this is the biggest put down in blogland! You came out with both barrels firing at this great blog about peace. Why do you guys do that?

No, that was not my intent. Sham on you Donna for trying to twist it into something it's not. My intent was to point out that John and Yoko could afford to stay in bed. I don't know their thoughts, but it was advertisement for them. Some people have families to feed, and responsibilities. IMO their are much better ways to support peace. Why should the righteous few dictate the "proper way"?

For example (and this is hypothetical) What if there was a movement to shoot a squirrel for world peace? Who are you to judge what someone else thinks brings peace? This sounds just as asinine as staying in bed to me, but then I'm not suggesting anyone go out and do it. That can be a problem with liberal thinkers, many believe they are the righteous and virtuous, so your wrong if you don't think their way.

So if you believe that I thought a couple of multi-millionaires staying in bed was at best a publicity stunt and at worst an act of laziness both when it happened and now you;d be correct. Had dynamaso stated that people with different opinions not reply, I wouldn't have. I am in no way saying the author is wrong for wanting to do or say anything, and the my quote in your post was sincere. Sorry if you think I disparaged the author,I believe I did not. Read my first post. That would have been the end of it, had dynamaso not comment on it. To me this was an invitation to discuss why I wrote what I did.  I think you should lighten up. You might as well have said "Give peace a chance or we'll kick your ass"

If you think politics are unrelated to "peace". then you are in a world unknown to me. IMO if you want peace you better be prepared to defend it, because a lot of folks out their don't want us to have it. If you think that's starting a pissing contest, then that's your right, and I can respect that while disagreeing.  

on Mar 28, 2009

I can kind of see where Nitro Cruiser is coming from here, but I don't agree that sit-ins are necessarily politically ineffectual. I think the key thing is that they have to be widespread to have a political effect. Hardly anyone notices if one person or even a score is missing on George Street on Saturday.

But there's another side to spending the day in bed, and I'm not surprised Nitro didn't pick up on it. People don't spend nearly enough time thinking these days, but dyno took a day off to do nothing but. I'm envious of the insights you get from such sustained quasi-meditation.

Sustained thought about a single issue is the very heart of innovation, and that's reflected in what you've written, dyno. I hope the clarity (or lack thereof if that's more the case) you've gained is useful to you.

If you think politics are unrelated to "peace". then you are in a world unknown to me. IMO if you want peace you better be prepared to defend it, because a lot of folks out their don't want us to have it

Ah yes, the classic lesson to an idiot - if you desire peace, prepare for war. I always wonder if Clauswitz had a secret book for clever people, in which he suggested that "if you desire peace, you prepare for peace with the following measures etc etc". I guess it didn't fit on a banner.

on Mar 29, 2009

Wow, I don’t log on to JU for a few days and look what I miss.

 

Nitro, I appreciate your comments although I don’t agree with you.  I saw John Lennon’s protest as a way of raising awareness using his celebrity status.  There is no way we’d be even talking about this if Lennon had been a nobody.  It wouldn’t have even blipped on media radar back then.  I certainly don’t see Lennon as a hypocrite for using his status to raise awareness either.  Sure, you might have seen it as a publicity stunt to promote his music but I’m less cynical about it.  I saw it as one man with the power to get a message out doing something about it.

I don’t have a problem with folks wanting peace, but unfortunately you have to fight for it sometimes, and sometimes you have to fight for others. Be glad you live in a society where you can protest, just realize how quickly that can change for the worse.

See, this is the type of argument constantly belittles the peace process.  It is circular, negative and unnecessarily pessimistic.  I have a lot more faith in human nature than this.  

Serenity,

Thanks very much for you further comments.  Nitro is entitled to his opinion and my responding to his comments was, in a way, trying to inspire some discussion about the topic at hand.  However, I do appreciate that you might have seen the comment as a putdown.  I’m a little thicker skinned than I might seem (or maybe I am thicker than I look ) 

Nitro,

That can be a problem with liberal thinkers, many believe they are the righteous and virtuous, so your wrong if you don't think their way.

Tar the conservatives with the same brush, Nitro.  Both sides of the political fence are capable of righteousness, even if they’re wrong.  However, as you correctly point out, by commenting on your comments, I was encouraging a discussion about this topic.  And at no time did I think you were disparaging.

 

Cacto,

I think the key thing is that they have to be widespread to have a political effect.

Exactly.  This further strengthens my point about Lennon using his celebrity status to get the peace message out. 

As you say, the day was indeed very meditative.  I spent a lot of time, as my original post suggests, in thought.  I wasn’t sure what would happen and certainly wasn’t expecting to find myself thinking the things I did.  I fully expected I would lie in bed, read a little, nap a little and watch a DVD or two.  The reality was quite different and somewhat enlightening.