Take a number and wait until you're called.
Published on January 20, 2005 By dynamaso In Misc
“The music business is a long shallow plastic hallway where thieves and pimps run free, and good men die like dogs… There is also a negative side.”

- Hunter S Thompson

“There is something sick about a person whose only interest is money. And the same can be said, I think for the Company whose sole goal is profit.”

- Richard J. Haayen

I can’t hold back any longer. I’ve held back from saying anything for ages but now I’ve had enough. I’ve had enough of manufactured Popstars and of Australian and World Idols. They’ve all sold their souls, right in front of millions of viewers (a scary statistic in itself).

I’ve had enough of major labels that only want to make sure their budgets are recouped and who don’t know the meaning of ‘artistic development’. I’ve had enough of the ‘copy protection’ debate. I paid for it, I should be able to make a copy or two for my personal use. The industry should have called this device ‘cash protection’ because all they are doing is money-grubbing.

I’ve had enough of multi-national music outlets who won’t buy or distribute local product but are more than willing to put up cardboard cutouts of the latest ‘gangsta’. David Chapelle, a black American comedian, made a really valid point when he said ‘the American Negro male is the most imitated man on the face of the earth’. Think about it and you’ll realise, unfortunately, how right he is. You only have to go into any mall to see groups of decidedly non-Negro youths standing around, dressed in oversized American football or basketball shirts, baseball caps on backwards and sporting attitudes and expressions ‘str8 outta Compton’. This looks all the more ridiculous by the fact that these guys could be living in Dubbo, Chelsea or Auckland. I call it the AIC Syndrome or the Appropriating Inappropriate Culture Syndrome.

Anyway, back to my main gripes. Following are some other things that piss me right off about the music industry at the moment:

1. The 'next big thing' tag - a shot to the head of any potentially good young band or over-the-top hype for talentless eyecandy.

2. Unscrupulous publicists who use anything as an excuse to promote their wards. Sometimes any publicity is NOT good publicity, especially when it involves footage of an artist bonking their boyfriend, girlfriend, a stripper or favourite pet. I like my pornstars naked but prefer my musicians/movie stars/sporting heroes clothed thanks.

3. Pubs who only put on bands who 'pull' punters. Yeah, sure, pubs have to make money, but then how is a new band supposed to build an audience if you can't play places where you could potentially gain new fans? Some bands might be able to bring a crowd of friends but does that necessarily mean they’re good?

4. Pubs who would rather pay a DJ a stack of cash to spin other people’s discs than take a chance on live performers. Considering bands don’t get a foot in the door at nightclubs, this trend is rather disturbing for traditional musicians. Almost as bad are the pubs that will only employ covers bands.

5. Music magazines that profess to be cool then put Britney Spears (or someone equally over-exposed) on their very next front cover.

6. Radio stations that profess to be cool then play Britney Spears etc., in the guise of 'trying to widen our demographic'. There is already too much of this clogging our airwaves. Give us something fresh, new and different, please.

7. Radio and television stations who dedicate themselves to lining the major label's pockets. Don't these leeches already have enough money?

8. ‘Video hit’ programming that consists mainly of American boys and girls in various states of undress, singing misogynistic rubbish to a melody-less backbeat. Doesn’t anyone know how to write a song any more?

I could go on, but I could also have a heart attack if I do. It hurts to think about all the truly talented folk I’ve met over the years who have been passed over in favour of the latest cutest boy or girl. I don't think it’s going to get better either, despite the good intentions of many dedicated folk. 'For the love of it' just doesn't have the same appeal as 'for the cash'.

Music used to be a thing of joy and celebration; something used to pass stories on from generation to generation, a living historical reference, if you will. The industry has become a money hungry cancerous beast, eating away at the general population, all the while growing tumourously fat and ugly.

While there are some great contemporary artists, more often than not they come from the independent side of the industry or, to put it another way, from the ‘non-commercial’ side of the business. In Australia, this means these artists have a hard work ethic, have to hold down day jobs to support themselves, love what they’re doing and aren’t the slightest bit interested in fashion or hype. This means no self-respecting corporate driven talent scout would even show the slightest bit of interest in them, unless they were to ‘crack’ the market under their own steam. It used to be that record companies looked to the independents to supply the next wave of talent. These days it seems an artist has to have a swag of cash, a vast crew of minders, a network of contacts, lawyers, solicitors and the ability to be in three places at once to get anywhere. An independent artist very rarely gets a look in.

The decay of the music industry into a decadent miasma will be its undoing. It won’t be a new ‘new wave’, or the next Beatles. It will be you and me who will undo it, us who spend the bucks buying music because we love it. I’m damn sure the commercial industry will become so self-absorbed, over-inflated and stodgy that we’ll all simply ignore it until it goes away. Maybe then true musicians will be heard.



Comments (Page 3)
3 Pages1 2 3 
on Jan 24, 2005
I'd be concerned if I had these words rattling around in my head


It's pretty much a usual thing. I'm not concerned. It's better than all the other things that "rattle" inside my head

-MX-
on Feb 04, 2005
I appreciate the thought that has gone into your article dynamaso, and I subscribe to much of what you say. However, if your fundamental premise is that music is no longer 'a thing of joy and celebration; something used to pass stories on from generation to generation', then I must respectfully disagree. That is to say, I think there is another angle to this issue.

I agree that this is what music 'used to be'. However, I would argue that it still is. Yes, you have to wade through piles of bilge to find anything of value, but - guess what? - you always did. Money-fixated major labels, Machiavellian publicists, superficial music magazines, revenue-dependent radio stations, hype, cultural theft (that alone is shorthand for the 50 year history of rock music, if you ask me), musically conservative venues, sex / violence as sales devices ... all these and more have been with us for as long as music has been a marketable commodity. You say Beatles, I say Monkees. You say Phil Spector, I say Mickie Most. You say Bacharach / David, I say Chinn / Chapman.

Are these mechanisms more prevalent / explicit than they used to be? Perhaps. They are certainly more sophisticated. However, does this mean that music is no longer 'a living historical reference'? Absolutely not.

We have a photogenic recall of past musical eras. We proudly remember the good from times past - eg. to cite a personal example from my youth, the Sex Pistols' 'God Save The Queen'. However, we quickly forget the plethora of (mostly) garbage that surrounded it in the charts at the time. Why? Because it was just that - garbage. With the benefit of the perspective afforded by distance, when in times to come we look back at 2005, we will remember that which is meaningful, memorable and substantial - and not than that which prompts you to rail against current music in your blog. This selective recall is why people remember 1984 as the year of Band Aid's 'Feed The World', and not of Joe Dolce's 'Shaddap Your Face' - the record that actually replaced the Band Aid single in the coveted British No. 1 spot.

Yes, the music industry stinks. (Personally, I would be just as pleased as you to see it sink into the mire.) Yes, musicians of value have their work cut out for them railing against the industry in order to produce their art. And yes, we the listeners undoubtedly have OUR work cut out for us in trying to find current music that is of any real value whatsoever. But - once again, guess what? - it's out there, and the effort is still very much worth it.
on Feb 04, 2005
'Joe Dolce's 'Shaddap You Face' - the record that actually replaced the Band Aid single in the coveted British No. 1 spot.'
Whoops - no it didn't. That'll teach me to check my facts before posting. It actually replaced John Lennon's 'Woman' at No. 1 some 4 years earlier. (Well, I knew its success incurred major wrath somehow or other! )

Purely as an aside, I saw Joe Dolce play at the Woodford folk festival in Queensland in the late '90s. He didn't play 'the hit', and he was tremendous.
on Feb 05, 2005
Furry Canary:

Are these mechanisms more prevalent / explicit than they used to be?


They most certainly are. I have friends who are 'well-in' the industry i.e. managing both national and international acts, involved in organisational aspects of BDO's etc. Conversations with these people ultimately led me to writing this article.

does this mean that music is no longer 'a living historical reference'? Absolutely not.


Okay, I will concede there is music out there passing on the politics and feeling of the time is was written. I suppose the perfect current example would have to be Green Day's 'American Idiot'. But you would have to admit these pieces are few and far between. I think part of my perhaps knee-jerk reaction in writing this was partially due to the amount of rubbish being fed the public. I KNOW there are some great songwriters out there. I've heard them, seen them and, in some case, I've even sat down and talked to them. For the most part, they are being completely ignored by the major labels.

it's out there, and the effort is still very much worth it.


I know it is because I go looking for it all the time. I'm constantly amazed by how much good music is out there too, believe me. I like going to the effort of looking for it. I find it an adventure, only one very few people are willing to undertake these days. Basically, if it is not on their favourite video show or played repeatedly on their favourite radio station, it is off their radar.

Thank you so much for your comments. It seems obvious to me we are of like mind about this subject. I really do appreciate your opinion on this as it has helped me define mine more. Incidentally, Joe Dolce's 'Shaddup You Face' is still the biggest selling Australian single ever. I'm glad you enjoyed him live. I've not ever had the opportunity to see him on stage. I've been told he is fantastic, but some part of me still cringes at his novelty aspect.

Thanks again for your comments and for bringing this thread back to life.

Cheers,

Maso
3 Pages1 2 3