Take a number and wait until you're called.
And it is definitely not a sin...
Published on April 5, 2005 By dynamaso In Misc
Recently, I was watching telly with my wife. The show, Desperate Housewives, is an intriguing mix of soap opera and murder mystery. I don’t think it is as good as a lot of critics would have us believe, but we don’t mind watching it, but for vastly different reasons I think. I could watch it with the volume turned off as I have always thought Terri Hatcher was a bit of all right (okay, that was a big understatement). And the other woman (who is having an affair with her gardener) is also very pleasant on the eyes. I know this might sound a little juvenile but what the hey.

In the show, the above-mentioned character was talking to a Catholic priest about confession and what it means to those who take part. The priest explained it means the confessor will be absolved from their sins so when they died, they wouldn’t end up in eternal damnation. After some further discussion, the priest asked what she wanted out of life. Her answer was simple: to be happy. His response was to say her answer was that of a spoilt child. It was at about this time I really sat up and really took notice.

I got to thinking about why the priest gave the answer he did (besides “it was in the script”). I don’t really think a priest would give this answer. After some discussion, my wife said she would like to think a priest would say to be at peace with oneself is to be truly happy. Therefore, if you’re feeling guilt or envy or jealousy or any negative emotion, then how can you really be at peace?

I believe it is actually a really sane thing to want to be happy. As for it being the answer of a spoilt child, I would disagree even further. I’m not a child and I’m certainly not spoilt. But I do work hard at being a happy person. Most of the time I succeed but like everyone else, I still get annoyed, angry or depressed. These days, though, I don’t dwell on these feelings. I recognise them, learn from them and move on. But it has taken me many years of practice to be able to do this. And these could hardly be considered the actions of a spoilt child.

As a child my parents spent a lot of time trying to keep my siblings and I happy. And they succeeded most of the time. As I got older, I tried to do the same for myself. I think the problem is when we are young, full of ideas and energy, but very little wisdom. We do things thinking we’re making ourselves happy when in fact we do anything but. This is when a lot of us are susceptible to abusive relationships or friendships based on what we have rather than who we are. I guess this is where we either learn from our mistakes and move forward, or repeat the cycle until we finally learn the lesson.

I believe every person wants to be happy. I believe it is a right for all of us. With any rights come responsibilities and I think this is where a lot of us fall down. Recognising what makes us happy is one thing but being able to be happy without it is another. It takes a lot of soul searching, hard work and constant maintenance. I think this is what causes anxieties and depression in a lot of people. For me, I’d rather be happy and viewed as a spoilt child than anything else. Go on spoil me. I dare you…

Comments (Page 2)
2 Pages1 2 
on Apr 12, 2005
Champas, once again, you've managed to get me thinking more about what I'm trying to say, something I particularly appreciate. I believe in order for these things to work for me, I have to distill the ideas down to a point where they are easy for anyone to understand. This is the reason I enjoy blogging so much because the input from people such as yourself helps with the distillation process.

I do, in fact, place an enormous amount of trust in my spiritual side and it is something I attend to every day, not just on sabbath or temple days or when I'm 'supposed' to attend. As I said in my article, recognising what makes me happy is one thing but to be happy without it is a different thing altogether. This is the state I am aiming to achieve. I'm not perfect, not by a long shot, but ever since I have given myself over to my spirituality, I can't begin to tell you the difference it has made in my life. Less worry, less stress, more creativity, peace and happiness are the rewards. And yes, it indeed does sound like a Zen state.

Now, if I could out get the Teri Hatcher thing sorted out...

Thanks so much for your input.
on Apr 13, 2005
Champas has pretty much said what I want to say. I think what the priest was trying to say in this context was that it is wrong to seek happiness in a way which causes pain to other people. So the priest wasn't against happiness per say just the way it which it is obtained.

P.S. I watch Desperate Housewives for the eye-candy too, I am not ashamed!
on Apr 14, 2005
Toblerone,

I think the thing that got me about this comment was it was not the sort of thing I expected a priest to say, particularly in this instance. To me, his comment sounded completely like he was making a judgement of the female character. A true priest would never do this. His role is not to make judgements because he understands, within the bounds of his religion, the only one who can make judgements is God.

it is wrong to seek happiness in a way which causes pain to other people


...unless you're in a S&M relationship, and then it is expected.

Eye candy, in my books, is just about the sweetest. The only think better is real Candy, but she moved to Perth...
on Apr 18, 2005
I think the thing that got me about this comment was it was not the sort of thing I expected a priest to say, particularly in this instance. To me, his comment sounded completely like he was making a judgement of the female character. A true priest would never do this. His role is not to make judgements because he understands, within the bounds of his religion, the only one who can make judgements is God.


Actually when you put it that way I agree with you. I think in this situation he could see she wasn't the least bit repentant and he lashed out at her. I can't say I entirely blame him for the way he reacted, he is only human and she was treating the idea of confession like it means she can do whatever she wants as along as she confesses later. It wasn't appropriate for a priest to act like that though.


...unless you're in a S&M relationship, and then it is expected.Eye candy, in my books, is just about the sweetest. The only think better is real Candy, but she moved to Perth...


Hehehe, funny
on Apr 19, 2005
I can't say I entirely blame him for the way he reacted, he is only human and she was treating the idea of confession like it means she can do whatever she wants as along as she confesses later.


I've always had a problem with the idea of confession for this very reason. It is sort of a fail-safe for some mercenary Catholics to get away with any atrocious behaviour so long as they say they are sorry to God. (I think of the killings done in the name of the IRA, for instance).
2 Pages1 2