Take a number and wait until you're called.
And I'm prepared to take the blame...
Published on May 3, 2005 By dynamaso In Misc
I’m writing this in response to a number of pieces I’ve read here recently and to a disturbingly increasing amount of media reports about this as well. I want to know where people think personal responsibility stops and where public liability starts?

I believe there are very few instances where personal responsibility should stop. The way I see it, if I trip over the crack in the sidewalk or spill a hot beverage on myself, I am the only person responsible. If I drive my car into oncoming traffic because the sun has reflected off a building into my eyes, well, it is an accident but no one is to blame, unless you want to blame the sun. It is an Act of Nature that has caused the accident. The people who own the building or clean the windows can’t be held responsible. Accidents do happen. And when accidents happen, sometimes people get hurt. It is unfortunate or, in some cases, even tragic, but it is reality. Some of the suits I’ve read about recently are anything but realistic. Yet people still pursue them and judges still let them be heard.

How about if I were in my own kitchen and my wife had made a nice hot cup of coffee, which I then spilt over myself? I’m not going to sue her, am I? She knows I’m an adult and I should be able to hold a hot cup of coffee. Her trusting in this is preconceived, sure, but putting trust in pretty much anything or anyone involves having some sort of preconceived notion of how they will behave. (As an aside, I also am acutely aware of how clumsy I can be, so I am more than willing to say ‘Oops’, apply some antiseptic cream to the burn and clean up the mess).

Personal responsibility has eroded to the point in Australia where events such as school fetes and dog shows are unable to go ahead because the insurance costs are just too much for the organisers to cover. Most of the events hurt by this are usually community or charity events. The other group hit hardest are the small sports clubs. These clubs usually rely on nominal participation fees and are most often formed for the benefit of local children. With both media and politics focussing on obesity levels, particularly concerning children, this situation only highlights the inadequateness of our local, state and national authorities in not doing anything about stemming the flow of ridiculous suits.

Another option, as far as I can see, is for the government to instigate a public-funded Department of Blame, whose sole role is to take the blame for anything falling outside the brackets of personal responsibility. I envisage roaming Blame Clerks, who can be called to contentious mishaps and make on-the-spot decisions based on immediate facts. As I see it, there are only three decisions the incident can be decided against. The first is ‘No-ones Fault’, the second is ‘Individual Fault’ and the third is ‘Department of Blame’s Fault’. The only time a person can pursue a suit is if the incident is deemed the ‘Department of Blame’s Fault’.

The third and final option, in my opinion, is for someone to take the blame. For everything. Always. Sure, the first few people who sue will get something, but every one after won’t see a red cent. Hopefully, the world will forget one person is to blame and start taking their personal responsibility seriously. So with this in mind, I volunteer myself. I’ve even got my tag line prepared - “Oops, sorry, it will happen again.”


Comments (Page 1)
2 Pages1 2 
on May 03, 2005
This thread reminds me of a book I read years ago called 'Blaming The Victim"....
It's not always YOUR fault... so don't be so quick to apologise.
on May 03, 2005

Unfortunately, in this Litigious society, we are being taught by both lawyers and politicians, that nothing is our fault, and that SOMEONE must pay.  The concept of personal responsibility is being subverted by the concept of no one is mature enough to make decisions for themselves.

And I dont see it stopping until and unless The politicians quit trying to protect us from ourselves, and lawyers start getting penalized for frivilous lawsuits.

on May 03, 2005
You can't do this, everything is my fault, I said so years ago. Although, maybe I was wrong... Blame dynamaso, it's his fault
on May 03, 2005
Our modern society is becoming more and more like the ancient Greeks for whom lawsuits were a form of public entertainment.
on May 03, 2005
lawyers start getting penalized for frivilous lawsuits.


This is true. In the case of any individual who had something happened to them, if they personally don't take stock and say, ok, this is my fault. It will take another person, namely a professional like a lawyer, to see the situation from another point of view and see if it's valid. Until they start doing that, nope, nothing will change.
on May 03, 2005
Yes, where I work the golden rule is COVER YOUR ASS! you don't want to be caught with the liability "hot potato" when the music stops!

I'm so glad your back, BTW!!!!!
on May 03, 2005
Mano,

It's not always YOUR fault... so don't be so quick to apologise


I know its not always my fault, but I am happy to take the blame if it means freeing up our judicial system of frivilous suits. The book, though, sounds very interesting. You don't happen to remember the author's name, do you? Thanks for your comments.

Hey Dr. Guy,

And I dont see it stopping until and unless The politicians quit trying to protect us from ourselves, and lawyers start getting penalized for frivilous lawsuits


I think the media also has a responsibility. If less fuss was made about stupid suits, then there wouldn't be articles out there giving others similar ideas. I am still keen for the idea of a 'Department of Blame'. I really think it would work.

Danny, maybe we could share the blame or alternate it between us. Oh, I know, you look after the Northern hemisphere and I'll look after the Southern hemisphere. How does that sound?

Mason, I don't think many of us would find today's suits entertaining unless the losers were punished in some publically humiliating way. I think this would also stem the flow of frivilous suits as well. Now there is food for thought. Thanks for your comments.

Shovel,
where I work the golden rule is COVER YOUR ASS


What an awful way to work. It means no one is willing to take any risks or make any changes. And the only time anything new happens is after something has gone wrong. Like George Bernard Shaw said 'Progress is impossible without change'. Incidentally, I'm glad I'm back. Thanks for the comments, mate.
on May 03, 2005
That works, I can be the blamed one for half the world
on May 03, 2005
Danny, I had a better thought. Rather than dividing it by Northern and Southern hemispheres, to be fair, I think we should divide it East and West. At least we have a chance of having around the same number of people. As it stands, you have the majority of the world's population on your side. Unless of course, you're a glutton for punishment. If so, I'm happy to leave it as is.
on May 03, 2005
Makes no difference to me, half is better then all in this case.
on May 03, 2005
Okay then, I'll take the East and you can have the West. How does this sound?
on May 03, 2005
Sounds round to me
on May 04, 2005
No, no, its flat, I tells you, flat...
on May 09, 2005
What's so strange about the letigious society we're starting to copy from the USA is that both the Left and Right are extremely critical of it. So whose fault is it? Can this be the first thing the Department of Blame takes the blame for: too much blaming.

It's depressing how people want the entire world to be kiddie-safed. There are dangerous things in the world: deal with it. God or whoever didn't make trees with safety mats underneath, It didn't make rocks with foam on the inside. Kids will fall and break their arms, and then the arm will heal.

We have become so obsessed with trying to tblame someone else, trying to seek revenge that we can't face the idea that sometimes no one is to blame, as you said. An excellent point.

"I think the media also has a responsibility.'

ARRRGGHHH! My pet hate: blame the media. If you don't want a crap media, stop watching ACA, don't buy the Courier Mail and don't listen to Lawsy. They churn this stuff out because the public wants it. That's no excuse, but there are journos who do the right thing...and you've never heard of them because no one tunes in to read well-considered, unsensational journalism. In fact, Ray was a good journo until he realised that he was going to make more money doing Channel Nine stuff. The public can whinge all they like, but the media only gives the public what it will pay for. There's a case for personal responsibility on a grand scale.
on May 09, 2005
I know its not always my fault, but I am happy to take the blame if it means freeing up our judicial system of frivilous suits. The book, though, sounds very interesting. You don't happen to remember the author's name, do you? Thanks for your comments.


read this link....
Link
2 Pages1 2